🔗 Share this article

I have a few opinions regarding the comments delivered by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler after Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player in the US Open last eight. Consider – Fritz is American, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions often encourage nationalism. Some disappointment was appropriate. Rather, Fowler brought up the ongoing drought of American men at the majors: not one of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

We all enjoy a storyline, myself included. But really. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, who Fritz has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven major titles (and the Spaniard went on to defeat a tired Serbian in the next round). He stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually preferred his draw, because it offered the chance to beat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is more than within his right to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match who else sensibly had the drought of US winners in mind?

The American star's second serve the only thing between her and consistent victories

Fritz, 28, is placed fourth in the world entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his last six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that is as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of performance metrics away. His elite serve and powerful strength on each front side and backhand are sufficiently adequate to dispose of the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is often overmatched. The last several years has seen the interesting emergence of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising speed and grace of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was controlling, and hitting a soft shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a pretty severe restriction on his upside.

The American has achieved a several significant, unexpected advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he suddenly exploded to No 4 – and held the position. But the next leap, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing slump of American men winning grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that exact quarter-final should have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four sets, a victory that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a few match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the rallies, with the American earning numerous opportunities to break. But the champion saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the brink of frustration. When Fritz finally did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible service game to lose his own serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and compelled him to expend far too much effort to win it. Facing match points in the last game, Fritz’s primary delivery floated to heaven. He extended the match twice on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, only a result of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly compelling proof that the American is not good enough to beat any version of Djokovic, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and never particularly appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed enough knowledge and tactical know-how to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The problem is the individuals who were expecting the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in media sessions, exceeding almost everyone on the ATP aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only say how he feels or the tactic he believed determined a match, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Now that the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” Fritz informed a journalist in June of claiming a major. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is in fact extremely improbable for all other players. {